O$A is an intelligence network, which uses all the tricks of the intelligence trade.
On 2 Feb 2001 18:04:29 -0000, Centurion (email@example.com) wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>OSA checklist for handling "entheta" on ARS
>1) Feign affinity and agreement. Agree with entheta terminal's
>likes and dislikes. Run gentle 8-C as necessary.
Wag the wog (R).
>2) If A-R-C per #1 not possible, attempt to repel entheta
>terminal by giving it lots of what it dislikes.
Kick the wog (R).
>3) If terminal not responsive per #2, conscript allies.
Get others to kick the wog (R). "The bank follows the line of attack."
>entheta as originating from opposition terminal or Org. E.g.
>"[Name of Entheta terminal] is OSA."
Confuse wogs (R) into kicking the wog (R). Hopeful have him killed by
>4) If audience doesn't swallow #4, alter entheta terminal's
>messages or create discreditable messages and post via a similar
Frame the wog (R). Sabotage the wog (R). Well, cover all bases, fair
game the wog (R).
>5) If conscripts don't respond per #3, confuse identities. Rumor
>that entheta terminal and his failed handlers are one in the same
>person. E.g. Ralph Dorian is ptsc.
O$A is nuts. I've been ptsc from the day I escaped from the cult in
But yes, O$A is an intelligence network, which uses all the tricks of
the intelligence trade. Fortunately, they are handicapped by having to
work for, front for and defend a completely worthless psychotech and
$cientology is at its core an espionage cult. It is based on something
it calls "total espionage," taken from a book with that title. What
O$A is actually working and fronting for and defending is
$cientology's espionage apparatus. The psychotech and philosophy are a
cover for espionage.
(c) Gerry Armstrong
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:36:12 -0700, in Message-ID:
>&$60;3A77C06C.3F550055@yahoo.com>, Bob Dobbs
> (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
>>Let me get this straight - you laugh, saying they can only
>>criticize you by messing with your writing?
>The posts from . . .
>Ralph Dorian (email@example.com)
> . . . are examples.
>"Messed with" probably by Ted "ptsc" Corinthian or Mike "unusual"
>These guys aren't satisfied with reasoning, insistence, and name
>calling. They have to take my material and twist it. Or they just
>post through the above addresses in a way that they hope
>>How else could they criticize you - mock
>>the sound of your voice and haircut?
>I know, I'm not giving them much choice.
>;-) I'm not much concerned about it. It's just a sign that
>>As your writing is the only thing anyone sees of you
>>here, it would be presumptuous to criticize you for much else.
>You don't seem to get it, Bob. They're posting garbage under fake
>addresses in hopes it will be perceived as mine.
>>Please examine your statements before you hit that send button.
>This is my Address: (firstname.lastname@example.org)
>This is my PGP fingerprint: 222E 252F C976 52F4 B575
>CC27 4529 DCC0 1A7A 3ECA
>Please examine message headers and pgp signature before assuming
>>Maybe people will stop thinking of you as such a
>>ridiculous anus trying so hard to shit, but not even
>>mustering a fart with any stink to it.
>You trying to apply #2 per OSA checklist above?
>- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
>- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>This PGP signature only certifies the sender and date of the message.
>It implies no approval from the administrators of nym.alias.net.
>Date: Fri Feb 2 18:04:28 2001 GMT
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Copyright © Gerry Armstrong - All Rights Reserved.